[Churchofgaming] Possible Games Results!

[Carl Brown]

Range voting you say, larn somfin new evry day.
Interestingly, no-one (not even the DM) got thier first choice, but the
winning game was the game mentioned by almost everyone.
Anyways, after Runequest, Gulliver's, Young Gods, 1st ed D&D, and even
Krononauts going from fantasy to super-hard SF should be a refreshing
change.


<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: lev at rpgreview.net [lev at rpgreview.net]
>Sent: 9/22/2011 7:05:35 PM
>To: churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
>Subject: Re: [Churchofgaming] Possible Games Results!
>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm going to close voting now. The idea was for people to vote for
thier
>> favourites without influence. ;P
>
>Seeming that votes were public...
>
>> Anyway, as explained in the initial email this was not to be true
>> preferential voting.
>
>Hmmm. So you did. What you were actually using is 'Range Voting'.
Compare;
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferential_voting
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting
>
>> My vote? well I listed the games in my order of preference. There was
>> also one paper vote.
>> The winner is: Diaspora
>> second: Space 1889
>> Third: Classic Traveller
>
>Well, you're the GM. :)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Churchofgaming mailing list
>Churchofgaming at rpgreview.net
>http://rpgreview.net/mailman/listinfo/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net
>.
> 


<p><p>Care2 makes it easy for everyone to live a healthy, green lifestyle
and impact the causes you care about most. Over 12 Million members!
<a href="http://www.care2.com" target=_blank>http://www.care2.com</a><br /><br />
Feed a child by searching the web! Learn how <a href="http://www.care2.com/toolbar" target=_blank>http://www.care2.com/toolbar<a>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rpgreview.net/pipermail/churchofgaming_rpgreview.net/attachments/20110922/42fe5123/attachment.htm>